Screenshots you will not regret keeping

No, and for a growing number of teams the answer should be no. The Proof Ledger builds a verifiable record of delivered work from work edges, commits, tickets, documents, URLs, with zero pixel capture, which is a better answer for client proof and a far smaller privacy liability. Screen capture remains available where a specific obligation genuinely requires it.

A fixed cadence is a published schedule. People learn it, and the capture stops measuring anything. Jittered timing closes that gap without increasing how often captures are taken, which matters because every additional capture is additional exposure.

Yes. The deny-list is applied on the device before a frame is taken, so a denied application is not photographed at all. That is a meaningfully different guarantee from a tool that captures everything and hides some of it in the viewer.

They are notified and deep-linked to a review page scoped to them alone, where they can see the capture and raise a dispute. Disputes carry a right to human review, so the answer cannot be an automated decision, and the whole exchange lands on the record. An objection settled in the product is an objection that does not arrive as a claim.

As long as your retention policy says and no longer: lifecycle rules cover retention, erasure and subject-access requests. Indefinite retention is the setting that turns a single breach, or a single subject-access request, into a project, so it is not the default here.