workmonitor.
Best for managers who need tracked time to become billed hours, a payroll that balances and a priced view of where the week leaks.
- Idle time, in dollars
- Hours that bill themselves
- Jigglers caught, not paid
VSEmployee monitoring · For managers
Keep the tracking. Add the invoice, the payroll run and the margin.
Updated October 3, 2026. Hubstaff details reviewed September 7, 2026 from public materials — check them against its own site before you decide.
Where WorkMonitor wins
The difference that matters
Idle hours priced at your own cost rates, approved hours straight into invoices and payroll, and live margin on every project — tracked time that turns into billed time.
The real product — not a screenshot. Click a tab.
What it returns
Your headcount and loaded cost, the subscription already subtracted.
Salary plus everything on top of it.
ESTIMATED ANNUAL RETURN
Estimated net return $223,200 a year.
Arithmetic on your figures at the calculator’s low-end assumption of 6% of paid time recovered — not a measurement of your team. Itemise it by region and add-on
workmonitor.vsScreenshot-based monitoring
6differences, worked through below
With WorkMonitor
Each person’s week is measured against the standard you set, and the shortfall is priced at your own cost rates and rolled up by department.
Screenshot-based monitoring
An activity percentage per person. Turning it into money is a spreadsheet somebody builds at month end, if anybody does.
With WorkMonitor
Approved hours seed the invoice and the payroll run through one rate engine, so time that was worked becomes time that is billed without a re-key.
Screenshot-based monitoring
Time lives in the monitoring tool and billing lives somewhere else, joined by an export and a re-key every month.
With WorkMonitor
Alerts and a scheduled digest bring the exceptions to each manager, scoped to their team. The gallery is there when you need it, not a daily chore.
Screenshot-based monitoring
Somebody scrolls a screenshot gallery, team by team, looking for the problem.
With WorkMonitor
Integrity signals that detect simulated input and flag it, so a mouse jiggler shows up as what it is rather than as a productive day.
Screenshot-based monitoring
A fixed capture interval, which everybody learns within a week and works around.
With WorkMonitor
Focus and deep-work stretches with category overrides you control, and every score opens into its breakdown — so a decision built on it holds up when challenged.
Screenshot-based monitoring
Input volume, which rewards busy-looking work and penalises reading, thinking and pair work.
With WorkMonitor
A signed certificate the client verifies on a public page, without an account, disclosing only the fields you choose.
Screenshot-based monitoring
A deck of screenshots, which exposes the client’s own data and still turns into a meeting.
The question we get asked
Time back, mostly. Instead of opening a gallery to look for problems, each manager gets the exceptions — alerts, a priced shortfall per person, a weekly digest scoped to their team. And the hours stop leaking on the way to money: approved time seeds the invoice and the payroll run through one rate engine, so the figure the team tracked is the figure the client pays. Screenshots are still there under a policy you set; they are just no longer the job.
Reports & digests — scheduled delivery to email and Slack
The shortlist
WorkMonitor first, because this is our page. The other Hubstaff competitors in their own words, each with its own head-to-head.
workmonitor.
Workforce analytics that classifies app and website use into productivity dashboards for coaching.
WorkMonitor vs ActivTrakWorkforce analytics and performance reporting built around tracked time and distraction alerts.
WorkMonitor vs Time DoctorTime and activity tracking for hybrid teams, with visible and stealth monitoring modes.
WorkMonitor vs InsightfulA single productivity score derived from activity across the business tools a team already uses.
WorkMonitor vs ProdoscoreSwitching
Nobody switches tools if it means abandoning a year of history. The importer carries a mapper for Hubstaff exports, so the CSV you already have is the CSV we take — and it lands on the same ledger as everything captured after it.
What the importer reads from a Hubstaff export
emailmemberuserdatetimedurationhoursprojecttaskto-dotodonotenotesdescriptionDurations arrive as a clock duration like 1:30:00 and are parsed into whole minutes. First matching header wins, so a renamed column still lands.
After the import
Imported hours sit on the same ledger as everything captured after them, so last quarter’s cost and margin read the same way as next quarter’s. Corrections append with an author and a reason rather than overwriting, which is what lets you answer why a number changed long after anyone remembers.
Invoices — backed by recorded work
When Hubstaff is the better answer
You want continuous GPS breadcrumbing of a field workforce through the working day. We record presence at a job site when someone clocks in, and deliberately do not trace a route between them.
If that is the deciding requirement, buy that instead.
Questions
Answered about what WorkMonitor does, including where the answer is no.
Ask AI
Plain-language answers about your own workforce data, with the figures behind them. Pick a question to see how it reads.
Pick a question above and WorkMonitor AI will answer from your team's real numbers.
Take these with you
Here is what we would send a manager doing one for the first time: how to read a productivity number, what to say to a remote team before anything is installed, and a policy you can adopt as written.
Create the account, put the agent on a handful of desks, and leave it alone. On Friday you read the week instead of reconstructing it: hours against their projects, focus and idle per person, and the timesheets already filled in.
Free for two seats. No card, and no sales call to sit through.